Search
Elsewhere
Journal Entry Tags
4th amendment (1) aAi Weiwei (1) academia (3) ACO (2) agile (1) Ai Weiwei (1) anger (1) Anna Akhmatova (1) APHA (1) APHA Annual Meeting (1) Apple Computers (1) art (1) art wojnarowicz (1) Asian market (3) ASLME (2) back channels (1) back to work (1) backward design (1) bars (1) Bianchi (1) bicycle (3) blogs (1) bodhisattva vows (1) Boston (1) boundaries (1) Boundless Way (1) Brutalism (1) Bukowsi (1) Camaleonte Due (1) camping stoves (1) career choices (1) Chicago (1) Chinese (1) Chinese food (1) City Hall (1) cloud (1) CMS (1) comfort food (1) comics (1) communications (1) Connecticut Budget (1) cooking (2) Course Statistics (1) creativity (1) curious george (1) cyberlaw (1) cycling (1) Dad (1) dan benjamin (1) David Foster Wallace (5) diaries (1) dining (1) Dogen (3) ECPA (1) email (1) English Theater (1) esther duflo (2) evaluations (1) Exams (2) Facebook (2) fairness (1) family (1) federal budget (1) Federal Register Citation (1) finance (1) fishmonger (2) FQHC (1) funny (1) gay culture (1) Genjokoan (1) Google+ (1) government (1) greengrocer (1) grocer (1) Guatemala (1) hakuin ekaku (1) Hartford (3) HDH (1) Health Law Professors Conference (3) health policy (2) heart sutra (1) hiking (1) history (1) housekeeping (1) hsin-hsin ming (1) ideas (1) Infinite Jest (3) institutional organization (1) interdisciplinary teaching (1) internet (1) japanese (2) job posting (2) Joe Orton (1) John Roderick (1) Judicial Punishment (1) justice (1) Justin Bond (1) juzu (2) Kant (1) koan (1) Language (1) law (1) litigation (1) madeline (1) mala (1) management (1) mechanic (1) medical education (2) Merlin Mann (2) method (1) Mount Greylock (1) MSSP (2) Mu (1) NEJM (1) nobuyoshi araki (1) Nonprofit Accounting (1) ochazuke (1) Office Hours (1) Parrish (1) pentagram (1) personal websites (1) PHLR (1) photo (1) podcast (1) poetry (2) policy (2) PPACA (3) practice (2) Practice Note (1) precepts (2) professionalization (1) project management (1) public health (1) Public Health Law (8) public health law II (1) Public Health Law Research (2) Public Health Policy Development (2) Public Health Service (1) Quickbooks (1) quote (11) representation (1) research assistants (2) research methods (1) resources (1) RHC (1) Robert Aitken (1) Roseanne (1) rss (1) rules of the road (1) scott burris (1) social media (2) Soto (1) soy sauce (1) STDs (1) Steve Jobs (1) suzuki (1) tax (1) teaching (3) Temple Opening (1) tips (2) twitter (3) UCHC (4) UCONN (1) unitarian universalism (1) venereal disease (1) video (2) vivienne westwood (1) Washington DC (1) werner herzog (2) worcester (1) WPA (1) writing (1) Yokoyama (1) zahariadis (2) zazen (5) zen (11) zen practice (2) zen teachers (2) Zinsser (1)
Categories
« Camping Stoves | Main | Changes to NIH application guidelines post 12/31/2009 »
Thursday
Jan072010

Public Health Law Fall 2009: Course Statistics and Final Exam

Public Health Law, Fall 2009 is complete. All the grades have been submitted. I often get a lot of questions from students about their grades, and how they could have done better. I like to make some of the class data available so students can have a context for their grade and the outcome. I also like to post a copy of the final exam for students taking the class in the future. Having an old exam will provide some reference to the type of exam you can expect taking the class from me in the future.

The Numbers

This was the first time this class had been cross-listed as both a law course at UCONN Law School and as a public health course at UCHC. As such, it had both law and public health students in the class. School of enrollment was not taken into account in grading the final exams and in final course grades. Remarkably, there was little difference in the course statistics with the law students included and excluded.

The class mean grade was a B (84.8) and median was a B (88.5). Removing law students from the computations had little effect. Public health students alone, the mean was B (82.7) and the median was B (83.5). The distribution was a bit more normal with the removal of the law students.

As you can see from this image. The grades were fairly well distributed. You will notice that there are some differences between the years. These differences depended on a number of factors.

In previous years, there have been opportunities for early remediation of a poor grade. Also, earlier years graded on the +/- scale. My class did not. Additionally, this was the first year that this class was cross-listed at the law school.

What were predictors of success? It is clear that the following seemed to help:

  1. Public health students who studied in groups, especially ones with law students did better in the class.
  2. Students who outlined the class and studied regularly also tended to do better.
  3. Students who visited me in office hours and/or emailed with questions also probably did better.
  4. Class participation was an easy and effective way to increase your class grade.
  5. Writing legibly and in an organized way increased your exam score.

You can get a copy of the final exam here.

Future Classes

What did I learn in class? A lot. Student evaluations were very helpful. In the future, I am considering making some changes:

  1. Assigning a basic primer text on the legal system for the public health students and a basic primer on public health for the law students.
  2. Replacing discussion boards with a mid-term examination.
  3. Creating study groups for students matching law and public health students.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>